{"id":46257,"date":"2025-01-23T01:47:32","date_gmt":"2025-01-23T01:47:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/?p=46257"},"modified":"2025-01-23T01:50:50","modified_gmt":"2025-01-23T01:50:50","slug":"family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/","title":{"rendered":"Family Court Allows Appeal for Property Settlement Application Out of Time"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"46257\" class=\"elementor elementor-46257\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-62d649e elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"62d649e\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-1eda5c9\" data-id=\"1eda5c9\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-479b3ab elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"479b3ab\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<style>\/*! elementor - v3.9.0 - 06-12-2022 *\/\n.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-stacked .elementor-drop-cap{background-color:#818a91;color:#fff}.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-framed .elementor-drop-cap{color:#818a91;border:3px solid;background-color:transparent}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap{margin-top:8px}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap-letter{width:1em;height:1em}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap{float:left;text-align:center;line-height:1;font-size:50px}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap-letter{display:inline-block}<\/style>\t\t\t\t<p><strong>Key Words <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Family law, property settlement; out of time; section 44, hardship, leave for out of time application.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-e3bc82e elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"e3bc82e\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>The case of <em>Slocomb v Hedgewood<\/em> [2015] FamCAFC 219 (12 November 2015) was a Family Court of\u00a0Australia (\u201cFCA\u201d) Full Court hearing to determine to leave to appeal a decision made by the Federal\u00a0Circuit Court of Australia (\u201cFCC\u201d). The matter was heard by Judges May, Ainslie-Wallace &amp; Johnston.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>The Wife in the case had submitted an application for property settlement. The Application was 18\u00a0years outside of the statutory time limit. The Wife\u2019s application was refused by the FCC as she did\u00a0not provide an adequate explanation for lodging outside of the time limit. The Wife sought leave to\u00a0appeal the FCC decision to the FCA.<!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-66fbeee elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"66fbeee\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<style>\/*! elementor - v3.9.0 - 06-12-2022 *\/\n.elementor-heading-title{padding:0;margin:0;line-height:1}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title[class*=elementor-size-]>a{color:inherit;font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-small{font-size:15px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-medium{font-size:19px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-large{font-size:29px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-xl{font-size:39px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-xxl{font-size:59px}<\/style><h3 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Background<\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-0635d35 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"0635d35\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>The Husband and Wife commenced living together and married in 1989. After about 5 years the\u00a0parties separated in 1994. During the period they were married they had 3 children together. At the\u00a0time of separation, the children were 4, 3 and 1 years of age. In September 1995 the parties\u00a0divorced.<\/p>\n<p>At separation, the main property available for the division was the family home with equity of $15,000,\u00a0furniture worth $10,000 and a car worth $12,000. When the parties separated the Wife took the\u00a0car. In 1994 the Wife\u2019s solicitor wrote a letter to the husband proposing terms of settlement and\u00a0arrangements for the children. This letter stipulated that the Wife would take the car and some\u00a0items of furniture and in return the Wife would transfer her interest in the family home to the\u00a0Husband. In addition, it stated that the Wife would have sole care (then referred to as custody) of\u00a0the parties\u2019 children. The Husband did not agree with the care arrangements for the children and\u00a0settlement did not occur.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-4d34a7b elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"4d34a7b\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<h3 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Out of Time Application<\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-50bf9b5 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"50bf9b5\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>When asked why her Application was brought 18 years out of time, the Wife stated she was not\u00a0aware of the time limit. The Primary Judge considered the parties&#8217; circumstances including that the\u00a0Wife had taken the children into her care after separation, she had made no contribution to the\u00a0mortgage on the home, she received the car at separation and some items of furniture. The\u00a0Husband had paid child support for the children and he had paid the mortgage on the parties\u2019 home\u00a0and improved the property.<\/p>\n<p>In considering if leave should be granted for property settlement outside of the statutory time limit,\u00a0the Primary Judge referred to section 44 of the Act. Section 44(3) stops proceedings being brought\u00a0outside 12 months from the date of divorce. However, leave can be granted under section 44(4) to\u00a0bring an application for settlement outside of the time limit where hardship can be established. The\u00a0Primary Judge found that hardship could be established. This was because while the Wife could\u00a0pursue her property rights through State courts, her post-separation contribution would not be\u00a0considered by State courts.<\/p>\n<p>Despite hardship being found, the Primary Judge concluded that leave should not be granted. The\u00a0grounds of refusal being that the Wife did not have an adequate explanation for bringing her\u00a0Application 18 years out of time and allowing her to proceed would prejudice the husband.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-4eef84e elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"4eef84e\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<h3 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Principles for Out of Time Applications<\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-731e410 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"731e410\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>The Wife submitted an Application to the FCA for leave to appeal the FCC\u2019s decision. In considering the\u00a0Wife\u2019s application for leave to Appeals the Court considered the case of <em>McDonald and McDonald<\/em>\u00a0(1977) FLC 90-317. This case determined that in order to bring an out of time application an\u00a0applicant must establish:<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>1. that a case for relief exists;<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>2. that denial of the claim would cause hardship; and<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>3. an adequate explanation for the delay.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>In considering these principles, the Court established that the first two principles had been met. The\u00a0Wife had a case for property settlement and she would be in hardship if her Application was denied.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>The Court considered the Wife\u2019s explanation for bringing her Application out of time. The Wife\u2019s\u00a0stated she was not aware of the time limit. The Court took into account that the Wife engaged a\u00a0lawyer after a separation and the time limit was stated on paperwork for her divorce.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>The Court referred to the case of <em>Althaus and Althaus<\/em> (1982) FLC 91-233; (1979) 8 Fam L R 196\u00a0where it was found that the degree of hardship experienced by an applicant may outweigh an\u00a0inadequate explanation for bringing an out of time application.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>The Court then stated that while considering the three principles in <em>McDonald and McDonald<\/em>, it also\u00a0had to consider any prejudice to the other party. The Court considered the case of <em>Sharp and Sharp\u00a0<\/em>[2011] FamCAFC 150; (2011) 50 Fam LR 567 where that Court stated there is a presumption of\u00a0prejudice to a party where an application is brought out of time. However, the Court determined\u00a0the Husband had not pursued his settlement rights until 2012 and this should be taken into account.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --> <!-- wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p>The Court using the principles above decided that the Primary Judge had made an error of law in the\u00a0original finding. The Court granted the Wife\u2019s leave for appeal and determined that the matter\u00a0should be reheard. The primary reason was that it would be unjust to both the Husband and Wife if\u00a0their legal position with regard to their property were to remain as is. While the parties could\u00a0pursue their property rights in State court this would not ameliorate the Wife\u2019s hardship and this\u00a0outweighed the Wife\u2019s inadequate reason for bringing her Application out of time and any prejudice\u00a0caused to the Husband.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-bf448f2 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"bf448f2\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<h3 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Conclusion<\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-804dcc2 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"804dcc2\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>In this case, the Wife brought an Application for property settlement 18 years after the expiration of\u00a0the statutory time limit found under section 44 of the Act. However, section 44(3) allows the court\u00a0to accept an application outside of the statutory time limit but only where a case for the relief\u00a0sought exists, denying the claim would cause hardship and an adequate reason for the delay has\u00a0been provided. Other factors a court will take into account include prejudice to the other party for\u00a0allowing an out-of-time application.<\/p>\n<p>In this case, the Court decided that it would be unjust to both parties to leave property matters\u00a0between them unsettled. The Court granted leave to appeal and determined the matter was to be\u00a0reheard.<\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\n<p><!-- \/wp:paragraph --><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key Words Family law, property settlement; out<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":45654,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[218],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-family-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v19.14 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Family Court Allows Appeal for Property Settlement Application Out of Time - Goldman Law<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Family Court Allows Appeal for Property Settlement Application Out of Time - Goldman Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Key Words Family law, property settlement; out\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Goldman Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-23T01:47:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-23T01:50:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"350\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8a135619f74fbbb1715b99267c1c8449\"},\"headline\":\"Family Court Allows Appeal for Property Settlement Application Out of Time\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-23T01:47:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-23T01:50:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/\"},\"wordCount\":1038,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Family Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-NZ\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/\",\"name\":\"Family Court Allows Appeal for Property Settlement Application Out of Time - Goldman Law\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-23T01:47:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-23T01:50:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-NZ\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Family Court Allows Appeal for Property Settlement Application Out of Time\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/\",\"name\":\"Goldman Law\",\"description\":\"Best Law Firm\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-NZ\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Goldman Law\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-NZ\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"\",\"contentUrl\":\"\",\"caption\":\"Goldman Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8a135619f74fbbb1715b99267c1c8449\",\"name\":\"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-NZ\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1aa79bcc1122827fc136702ede1e4f99ee0d9ac1110b385c29ba945a8f6165e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1aa79bcc1122827fc136702ede1e4f99ee0d9ac1110b385c29ba945a8f6165e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/author\/gtg-admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Family Court Allows Appeal for Property Settlement Application Out of Time - Goldman Law","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Family Court Allows Appeal for Property Settlement Application Out of Time - Goldman Law","og_description":"Key Words Family law, property settlement; out","og_url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/","og_site_name":"Goldman Law","article_published_time":"2025-01-23T01:47:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-23T01:50:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":400,"height":350,"url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/"},"author":{"name":"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8a135619f74fbbb1715b99267c1c8449"},"headline":"Family Court Allows Appeal for Property Settlement Application Out of Time","datePublished":"2025-01-23T01:47:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-23T01:50:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/"},"wordCount":1038,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Family Law"],"inLanguage":"en-NZ","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/","url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/","name":"Family Court Allows Appeal for Property Settlement Application Out of Time - Goldman Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-01-23T01:47:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-23T01:50:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-NZ","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/family-court-allows-appeal-for-property-settlement-application-out-of-time\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Family Court Allows Appeal for Property Settlement Application Out of Time"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/","name":"Goldman Law","description":"Best Law Firm","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-NZ"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization","name":"Goldman Law","url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-NZ","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"","contentUrl":"","caption":"Goldman Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8a135619f74fbbb1715b99267c1c8449","name":"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-NZ","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1aa79bcc1122827fc136702ede1e4f99ee0d9ac1110b385c29ba945a8f6165e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1aa79bcc1122827fc136702ede1e4f99ee0d9ac1110b385c29ba945a8f6165e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/"],"url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/author\/gtg-admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46257"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46257\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46265,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46257\/revisions\/46265"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/45654"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}