{"id":46748,"date":"2025-01-31T01:32:00","date_gmt":"2025-01-31T01:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/?p=46748"},"modified":"2025-01-31T01:36:03","modified_gmt":"2025-01-31T01:36:03","slug":"high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/","title":{"rendered":"High Court Upholds Appeal Court Ruling That Wife Not Entitled To Spousal Maintenance"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"46748\" class=\"elementor elementor-46748\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-62d649e elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"62d649e\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-1eda5c9\" data-id=\"1eda5c9\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-9aea6e8 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"9aea6e8\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<style>\/*! elementor - v3.9.0 - 06-12-2022 *\/\n.elementor-heading-title{padding:0;margin:0;line-height:1}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title[class*=elementor-size-]>a{color:inherit;font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-small{font-size:15px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-medium{font-size:19px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-large{font-size:29px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-xl{font-size:39px}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title.elementor-size-xxl{font-size:59px}<\/style><h3 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Keywords<\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-c0a7ed0 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"c0a7ed0\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<style>\/*! elementor - v3.9.0 - 06-12-2022 *\/\n.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-stacked .elementor-drop-cap{background-color:#818a91;color:#fff}.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-framed .elementor-drop-cap{color:#818a91;border:3px solid;background-color:transparent}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap{margin-top:8px}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap-letter{width:1em;height:1em}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap{float:left;text-align:center;line-height:1;font-size:50px}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap-letter{display:inline-block}<\/style>\t\t\t\t<p>family law, spousal maintenance, interim spousal maintenance, appeal, financial resources, section 72, 72(1), section 75, section 75(2)(b), section 75(2)(o), spousal maintenance considerations, justice of the case.<\/p><p>The case of\u00a0<em>Hall &amp; Hall\u00a0<\/em>[2016] HCA 23 (8 June 2016) was a family law hearing heard in the High Court of Australia.\u00a0 The matter was brought to the High Court on appeal from a decision of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-5232a3a elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"5232a3a\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<h3 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Background<\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-9773cb0 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"9773cb0\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>This matter concerned a separated Husband and Wife after the Wife commenced proceedings in the Family Court. \u00a0The Wife asked the Family Court to consider the parties\u2019 property and financial circumstances and decide how the property between them should be divided.\u00a0 The parties were married in 2001 and separated 26 September 2013.\u00a0 There were 2 children from their relationship together.<\/p><p>The Wife asked the Family Court to consider an application for interim spousal maintenance while the court proceedings were underway.\u00a0 The court granted the Wife\u2019s request.\u00a0 The Husband disagreed with the Family Court\u2019s decision and lodged an appeal with the Full Court of the Family Court (\u201cFull Court\u201d).\u00a0 The Full Court reversed the Family Court\u2019s decision thereby stopping the Husband from having to pay interim spousal maintenance to the Wife.\u00a0 The Wife disagreed with the Full Court\u2019s decision and then appealed to the High Court of Australia (\u201cHigh Court).\u00a0 The Wife\u2019s appeal was dismissed by the High Court.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-46920c6 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"46920c6\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<h3 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Spousal Maintenance<\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-c9a7cfb elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"c9a7cfb\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>Spousal maintenance is payable under section 72 of the\u00a0<em>Family Law Act 1975<\/em>\u00a0(Cth) where one of the parties is unable to adequately support herself or himself as a result of:<\/p><ul><li>caring for a child or children under the age of 18;<\/li><li>age, physical or mental incapacity which hinders employment; or<\/li><li>for any other adequate reason.<\/li><\/ul><p>A court must consider section 75 of the Act when determining whether there is an adequate reason to justify spousal maintenance.\u00a0 These factors include but are not limited to:<\/p><ul><li>the age and health of a party;<\/li><li>the income, property and financial resources of a party;<\/li><li>the earning capacity of a party and any affect the relationship had on the party\u2019s earning capacity;<\/li><li>the commitments of each party to support himself or herself, any children or another person;<\/li><li>the eligibility of a party for a pension, allowance or benefit;<\/li><li>the eligibility for payments from superannuation;<\/li><li>the standard of living that is reasonable in the circumstances;<\/li><li>the period of the relationship and the contributions made by a party to the relationship;<\/li><li>child support being paid or that a party might be liable to pay for a child of the marriage;<\/li><li>whether a party is cohabitating with another person and the effect this cohabitation has on the financial circumstances of that party; and<\/li><li>any other fact or circumstances that in the opinion of the court would be just to take into account.<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-56ec7c5 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"56ec7c5\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<h3 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Wife\u2019s Spousal Maintenance Application<\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-0038d35 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"0038d35\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>The Wife made an application to the Family Court for an order that the Husband pay interim spousal maintenance for $10,833 per month.\u00a0 The Wife asked that this be paid until determination of the property proceedings between the Husband and Wife.<\/p><p>The Family Court granted the interim spousal maintenance application.\u00a0 The Husband disagreed with the Family Court\u2019s decision and filed an application to discharge the interim spousal maintenance order.\u00a0 To support the Husband\u2019s case he investigated the Wife\u2019s financial circumstances.\u00a0 The Wife\u2019s father had passed away in 2009.\u00a0 The Husband discovered that the Wife might have an entitlement under the father\u2019s Will.\u00a0 One of the Wife\u2019s brothers was administering the father\u2019s estate as the Executor.\u00a0 The Husband attempted to subpoena the father\u2019s will.\u00a0 The Executor refused to provide a copy of the Will.\u00a0 Instead, a solicitor on behalf of the brother provided an affidavit outlining the potential entitlements that the Wife may be entitled to under the Will as:<\/p><ol type=\"1\"><li>$16,500,000 if she divorced; and<\/li><li>An annual payment of $150,000 if the Wife did not divorce.<\/li><\/ol><p>In the father\u2019s Will he stated that the payments were to be paid by a group of companies that the father controlled when he was alive.\u00a0 The group of companies (the V Group) were left to the Wife\u2019s 3 brothers.\u00a0 The solicitor on behalf of the brother claimed it was unlikely that the Wife could force the V Group to make the payments.\u00a0 The Wife claimed she was unaware of the contents of the father\u2019s Will.<\/p><p>The Family Court heard the Husband\u2019s application to discharge the interim spousal maintenance order and dismissed the Husband\u2019s application.\u00a0 The Husband disagreed with the court\u2019s ruling and appealed to the Full Court.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-094b9ae elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"094b9ae\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<h3 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Husband\u2019s Appeal to the Full Court of the Family Court<\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-c5a1d99 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"c5a1d99\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>The Husband claimed the Primary Judge from the Family Court was wrong in dismissing his application to discharge the interim spousal maintenance order.\u00a0 The Husband claimed he provided sufficient evidence to show the Wife did not need spousal maintenance to support her.<\/p><p>On the other hand, the Wife provided a letter from her brother who was administering the father\u2019s estate.\u00a0 The letter explained that the payments to the Wife in the father\u2019s Will were voluntary.\u00a0 The letter stated that the payments could only be made by the V Group by choice of the Directors.<\/p><p>The Full Court concluded that the Family Court had failed to consider all of the evidence from the Husband in the original interim spousal maintenance hearing.<\/p><p>The question before the Full Court was whether there was sufficient evidence that demonstrated that the Wife could adequately support herself.\u00a0 The Full Court inferred from the evidence available that the Wife could receive a payment from the V Group of $150,000 annually if she requested it.\u00a0 Based on this the Full Court found the Wife could adequately support herself and dismissed the interim spousal maintenance order.<\/p><p>The Wife disagreed with the Full Court\u2019s decision and appealed to the High Court.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-9dca010 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"9dca010\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<h3 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Wife\u2019s Appeal to the High Court of Australia<\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-b1452fd elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"b1452fd\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>The High Court determined that the Wife\u2019s claim that the annual payment of $150,000 could not be included as a financial resource under section 75(2)(b) and section 75(2)(o) of the Act was wrong.\u00a0 The High Court stated that section 75(2)(b) of the Act concerned the practical ability of a party to support himself or herself.\u00a0 The High Court confirmed the correct interpretation under section 75(2)(b) of \u201cfinancial resources\u201d as being a source of financial support that a party can reasonable expect to be available.\u00a0 This must be something more than benevolence but the party need not control the financial source. Accordingly, the High Court dismissed the Wife\u2019s appeal and upheld the Full Court\u2019s decision.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Keywords family law, spousal maintenance, interim spousal<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":46749,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[218],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-family-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v19.14 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>High Court Upholds Appeal Court Ruling That Wife Not Entitled To Spousal Maintenance - Goldman Law<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"High Court Upholds Appeal Court Ruling That Wife Not Entitled To Spousal Maintenance - Goldman Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Keywords family law, spousal maintenance, interim spousal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Goldman Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-31T01:32:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-31T01:36:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/assaults-avos-480x270-1-768x512-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8a135619f74fbbb1715b99267c1c8449\"},\"headline\":\"High Court Upholds Appeal Court Ruling That Wife Not Entitled To Spousal Maintenance\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-31T01:32:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-31T01:36:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/\"},\"wordCount\":1110,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Family Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-NZ\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/\",\"name\":\"High Court Upholds Appeal Court Ruling That Wife Not Entitled To Spousal Maintenance - Goldman Law\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-31T01:32:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-31T01:36:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-NZ\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"High Court Upholds Appeal Court Ruling That Wife Not Entitled To Spousal Maintenance\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/\",\"name\":\"Goldman Law\",\"description\":\"Best Law Firm\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-NZ\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Goldman Law\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-NZ\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"\",\"contentUrl\":\"\",\"caption\":\"Goldman Law\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8a135619f74fbbb1715b99267c1c8449\",\"name\":\"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-NZ\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1aa79bcc1122827fc136702ede1e4f99ee0d9ac1110b385c29ba945a8f6165e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1aa79bcc1122827fc136702ede1e4f99ee0d9ac1110b385c29ba945a8f6165e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/author\/gtg-admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"High Court Upholds Appeal Court Ruling That Wife Not Entitled To Spousal Maintenance - Goldman Law","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"High Court Upholds Appeal Court Ruling That Wife Not Entitled To Spousal Maintenance - Goldman Law","og_description":"Keywords family law, spousal maintenance, interim spousal","og_url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/","og_site_name":"Goldman Law","article_published_time":"2025-01-31T01:32:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-31T01:36:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":768,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/assaults-avos-480x270-1-768x512-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/"},"author":{"name":"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8a135619f74fbbb1715b99267c1c8449"},"headline":"High Court Upholds Appeal Court Ruling That Wife Not Entitled To Spousal Maintenance","datePublished":"2025-01-31T01:32:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-31T01:36:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/"},"wordCount":1110,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Family Law"],"inLanguage":"en-NZ","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/","url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/","name":"High Court Upholds Appeal Court Ruling That Wife Not Entitled To Spousal Maintenance - Goldman Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-01-31T01:32:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-31T01:36:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-NZ","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/high-court-upholds-appeal-court-ruling-that-wife-not-entitled-to-spousal-maintenance\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"High Court Upholds Appeal Court Ruling That Wife Not Entitled To Spousal Maintenance"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/","name":"Goldman Law","description":"Best Law Firm","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-NZ"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#organization","name":"Goldman Law","url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-NZ","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"","contentUrl":"","caption":"Goldman Law"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8a135619f74fbbb1715b99267c1c8449","name":"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-NZ","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1aa79bcc1122827fc136702ede1e4f99ee0d9ac1110b385c29ba945a8f6165e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1aa79bcc1122827fc136702ede1e4f99ee0d9ac1110b385c29ba945a8f6165e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jaswinder (Jas) Singh Sekhon"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/"],"url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/author\/gtg-admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46748"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46748\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46754,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46748\/revisions\/46754"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/46749"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/envirounment\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}