{"id":736,"date":"2022-01-21T14:25:55","date_gmt":"2022-01-21T14:25:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-communitya\/?p=736"},"modified":"2023-02-11T10:08:57","modified_gmt":"2023-02-11T10:08:57","slug":"counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Counseling Sessions Revealing Possible Child Abuse and Family Violence Deemed Admissible Evidence By Family Court"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The case of <em>Douglas &amp; Mauldon<\/em> [2015] FCCA 2217 (17 August 2015) was a Federal Circuit Court of Australia case about parenting matters between the Applicant wife and Respondent husband.&nbsp; The case involved objections to documents requested by way of subpoena.&nbsp; The subpoena requested information from The Benevolent Society about counselling services that they provided to the wife and children.&nbsp; Both The Benevolent Society and the wife objected to the documents and information being made available to the husband.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Relative Law<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Family Law Act 1975 <\/em>(Cth) (\u201cAct\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 <\/em>(Cth) (\u201cFCC Rules\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Evidence Act 1995<\/em> (NSW) (\u201cNSW Evidence Act\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Evidence Act 1995<\/em> (Cth) (\u201cCTH Evidence Act\u201d)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Background<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The wife was seeking sole parental responsibility for the couple\u2019s two children and for the children to have no contact with the husband.&nbsp; The husband had been convicted of criminal offences and jailed.&nbsp; These offences included crimes against children below the age of 16 years. &nbsp;Some of the offences were perpetrated against the couple\u2019s children.&nbsp; As a result of the husband\u2019s crimes, the Department of Immigration revoked his residency visa.&nbsp; When the husband was released from jail he was placed into immigration detention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Subpoena of Information<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>An Independent Children\u2019s Lawyer (\u201cICL\u201d) was assigned to represent the children\u2019s best interests under section 68L of the <em>Family Law Act 1975<\/em> (Cth) (the \u201cAct\u201d).&nbsp; The subpoena originated from the ICL and was directed towards The Benevolent Society.&nbsp; The subpoena requested information about counselling services that the Benevolent Society provided to the wife and children and included a request for information about what was discussed during counselling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Objections to Subpoena<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Both the wife and The Benevolent Society had objected to the subpoena.&nbsp; The Benevolent Society objected on the grounds that the counselling for the wife and children was made in confidence and was for child welfare services.&nbsp; The wife objected on the grounds that the documents produced were likely to contain allegations made against the husband which were made in confidence.&nbsp; The wife asked that the documents not be shown to the husband or the husband\u2019s legal representative as this would affect the well-being of the wife and children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Subpoena Rules and Objections<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In considering the objections the Court looked at the Federal Circuit Court Rules (\u201cFCC Rules\u201d),&nbsp;Part 15A relating to subpoenas.&nbsp; Rule 15A.13(2) provides that a person must object to a subpoena under rule 15A.14 by the date the subpoenaed information is due.&nbsp; The objections to the ICL\u2019s subpoena were made within the time limit.&nbsp; The Court stated it could set aside a subpoena or part of a subpoena under rule 15A.09 subject to the rules of evidence and due process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court noted that there were no grounds for a claim of privilege under section 126A of the NSW Evidence Act for professional confidential relationship privilege.&nbsp; The Court then looked at the duties owed by the parties to make the information requested by subpoena available to the Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Admissibility of Evidence and Disclosure Requirements<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court was concerned that the wife and The Benevolent Society were attempting to withhold information that revealed allegations of child abuse or family violence.&nbsp; These allegations could meet the definition of the section 4 interpretation of child abuse and section 4AB definition of family violence under the Act.&nbsp; Following on from this are sections 67Z and 67BA of the Act which apply if an interested person makes allegations of child abuse.&nbsp; In such a case the interested person must file a Notice of Risk to the Court under Part 22A of the FCC Rules.&nbsp; In such a case the Court must abide by section 67ZBB of the Act.&nbsp; This section requires the Court to consider making interim or procedural orders to enable evidence about allegations of abuse or family violence to be gathered and to protect the child.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court stated that the wife has obligations under the FCC Rules, the Act and common law to provide evidence about allegations of child abuse or family violence.&nbsp; The wife\u2019s objection to the production of the subpoenaed information was contrary to her obligations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court then looked at the confidentiality protection provisions for family counselling available under section 10D of the Act.&nbsp; The Court found that the counselling provided by The Benevolent Society did not meet the definition of family counselling under the Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court considered that the information subject to the subpoena was directly relevant to the question of the risk of child abuse or family violence.&nbsp; It was therefore relevant evidence under section 55(1) of the Commonwealth\u2019s Evidence Act and was admissible to the proceeding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Based on the above considerations the Court found that the subpoenaed information should be made available to all parties involved in the case.&nbsp; However, the objections as far as the information that would disclose the location of the wife or children or any other identifying information was upheld.&nbsp; As such the Court allowed the redaction of any identifying information before the husband could view The Benevolent Societies\u2019 documents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This case shows that parties may subpoena relevant evidence which relates to either child abuse or family violence.&nbsp; Unless subpoenaed information is covered by legal professional privilege, or there is an exception under applicable legislation (including the Act), the subpoenaed information is admissible.&nbsp; This can include confidential information such as in this case relating to counselling services and what was discussed during counselling.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The case of Douglas &amp; Mauldon [2015] FCCA 2217 (17 August 2015) was a Federal Circuit Court of Australia case about parenting matters between the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":693,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[47,82,51],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Counseling Sessions Revealing Possible Child Abuse and Family Violence Deemed Admissible Evidence By Family Court - Online Community Goldman Lawyers<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Counseling Sessions Revealing Possible Child Abuse and Family Violence Deemed Admissible Evidence By Family Court - Online Community Goldman Lawyers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The case of Douglas &amp; Mauldon [2015] FCCA 2217 (17 August 2015) was a Federal Circuit Court of Australia case about parenting matters between the&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Online Community Goldman Lawyers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-01-21T14:25:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-02-11T10:08:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"350\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jaswinder (Jas) Sekhon &amp; Goldman &amp; Co Lawyers Pty Ltd\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jaswinder (Jas) Sekhon &amp; Goldman &amp; Co Lawyers Pty Ltd\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Jaswinder (Jas) Sekhon &amp; Goldman &amp; Co Lawyers Pty Ltd\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#\/schema\/person\/c6ffeb1ec3dbd0620841c4a595dc5363\"},\"headline\":\"Counseling Sessions Revealing Possible Child Abuse and Family Violence Deemed Admissible Evidence By Family Court\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-21T14:25:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-02-11T10:08:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/\"},\"wordCount\":934,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Commercial &amp; Corporate\",\"Cyber Law\",\"Litigation &amp; Disputes\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/\",\"name\":\"Counseling Sessions Revealing Possible Child Abuse and Family Violence Deemed Admissible Evidence By Family Court - Online Community Goldman Lawyers\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-21T14:25:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-02-11T10:08:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings.jpg\",\"width\":400,\"height\":350},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cyber Law\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/category\/cyber-law\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Counseling Sessions Revealing Possible Child Abuse and Family Violence Deemed Admissible Evidence By Family Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/\",\"name\":\"Online Community Goldman Lawyers\",\"description\":\"Just another WordPress site\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Online Community Goldman Lawyers\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/logoheader_final.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/logoheader_final.png\",\"width\":843,\"height\":222,\"caption\":\"Online Community Goldman Lawyers\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#\/schema\/person\/c6ffeb1ec3dbd0620841c4a595dc5363\",\"name\":\"Jaswinder (Jas) Sekhon &amp; Goldman &amp; Co Lawyers Pty Ltd\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4bac3846ac3956fe16300665774d807c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4bac3846ac3956fe16300665774d807c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jaswinder (Jas) Sekhon &amp; Goldman &amp; Co Lawyers Pty Ltd\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/localhost\/buddyboss\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/author\/community-goldman\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Counseling Sessions Revealing Possible Child Abuse and Family Violence Deemed Admissible Evidence By Family Court - Online Community Goldman Lawyers","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Counseling Sessions Revealing Possible Child Abuse and Family Violence Deemed Admissible Evidence By Family Court - Online Community Goldman Lawyers","og_description":"The case of Douglas &amp; Mauldon [2015] FCCA 2217 (17 August 2015) was a Federal Circuit Court of Australia case about parenting matters between the&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/","og_site_name":"Online Community Goldman Lawyers","article_published_time":"2022-01-21T14:25:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-02-11T10:08:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":400,"height":350,"url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jaswinder (Jas) Sekhon &amp; Goldman &amp; Co Lawyers Pty Ltd","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jaswinder (Jas) Sekhon &amp; Goldman &amp; Co Lawyers Pty Ltd","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/"},"author":{"name":"Jaswinder (Jas) Sekhon &amp; Goldman &amp; Co Lawyers Pty Ltd","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#\/schema\/person\/c6ffeb1ec3dbd0620841c4a595dc5363"},"headline":"Counseling Sessions Revealing Possible Child Abuse and Family Violence Deemed Admissible Evidence By Family Court","datePublished":"2022-01-21T14:25:55+00:00","dateModified":"2023-02-11T10:08:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/"},"wordCount":934,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings.jpg","articleSection":["Commercial &amp; Corporate","Cyber Law","Litigation &amp; Disputes"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/","url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/","name":"Counseling Sessions Revealing Possible Child Abuse and Family Violence Deemed Admissible Evidence By Family Court - Online Community Goldman Lawyers","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings.jpg","datePublished":"2022-01-21T14:25:55+00:00","dateModified":"2023-02-11T10:08:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Court-Looks-At-Meaning-of-Public-In-Relation-To-Publication-of-Proceedings.jpg","width":400,"height":350},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/counseling-sessions-revealing-possible-child-abuse-and-family-violence-deemed-admissible-evidence-by-family-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cyber Law","item":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/category\/cyber-law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Counseling Sessions Revealing Possible Child Abuse and Family Violence Deemed Admissible Evidence By Family Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#website","url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/","name":"Online Community Goldman Lawyers","description":"Just another WordPress site","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#organization","name":"Online Community Goldman Lawyers","url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/logoheader_final.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/logoheader_final.png","width":843,"height":222,"caption":"Online Community Goldman Lawyers"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#\/schema\/person\/c6ffeb1ec3dbd0620841c4a595dc5363","name":"Jaswinder (Jas) Sekhon &amp; Goldman &amp; Co Lawyers Pty Ltd","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4bac3846ac3956fe16300665774d807c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4bac3846ac3956fe16300665774d807c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jaswinder (Jas) Sekhon &amp; Goldman &amp; Co Lawyers Pty Ltd"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/localhost\/buddyboss"],"url":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/author\/community-goldman\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=736"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59130,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736\/revisions\/59130"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/693"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goldman-lawyers.com\/online-law-community\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}